Sri Lanka Passes Bill Allowing Government to Remove Posts
Sri Lanka’s parliament has passed the controversial Online Safety Bill. It gives the government broad powers to regulate online content and social media platforms. The bill allows a commission to order the removal of “prohibited statements” and pursue legal action against publishers.
The legislation passed with 108 votes in favor and 62 against. It comes as Sri Lanka tries to recover from a severe economic crisis. Last year, protests demanding reform led to the ousting of top leaders.
Those found guilty of publishing prohibited content face hefty fines and up to five years in prison. International organizations worry these restrictions could weaken governance and increase corruption. Tech giants warn the bill could harm Sri Lanka’s digital economy.
The bill’s passage raises fears about Sri Lanka sliding towards authoritarian rule. UN experts caution it could suppress dissenting voices. Concerns persist about the bill’s impact on freedom of expression and press freedom.
This comes as Sri Lanka prepares for presidential elections later this year. The new law could affect Sri Lanka’s evolving digital landscape. Many worry about its long-term effects on democracy and free speech.
Key Takeaways
- Sri Lanka’s parliament passes the Online Safety Bill, allowing government control over online content and social media.
- The bill empowers a commission to order the removal of “prohibited statements” and take legal action against publishers.
- Critics warn the bill could stifle dissent, undermine the digital economy, and lead to authoritarian rule.
- Sri Lanka is still recovering from a severe economic crisis and political upheaval in 2022.
- Concerns persist about the bill’s impact on freedom of expression and press freedom as Sri Lanka prepares for presidential elections.
Sri Lanka’s Controversial Online Safety Bill
Sri Lanka’s Online Safety Bill has sparked controversy due to its potential impact on digital rights and free speech. The bill aims to regulate internet content and remove posts deemed “prohibited statements.”
It was published on September 18, 2023, and tabled in Parliament on October 3, 2023. The bill proposes a government-appointed commission to oversee online content regulation.
Key Provisions of the Bill
The bill proposes a five-member Online Safety Commission appointed by Sri Lanka’s Executive President. This commission would have the power to remove content and block access to accounts.
The bill sets harsh penalties for online posts, including up to 20 years imprisonment. This has raised concerns about the severity of punishments for online activities.
The proposed legislation outlines various offenses with punishments including imprisonment and fines. These are detailed in the table below:
| Offense | Punishment |
|---|---|
| Sharing prohibited statements | Up to 5 years imprisonment and/or fine |
| Failure to comply with commission orders | Up to 2 years imprisonment and/or fine |
| Repeated violations | Up to 20 years imprisonment and/or fine |
Opposition and Criticism from Media and Civil Rights Groups
Media, internet, and civil rights groups strongly oppose the Online Safety Bill. They argue it would undermine freedoms and create a chilling effect on free speech.
From October 3rd to 17th, 2023, 45 petitions challenged the bill’s constitutionality. This highlights widespread concern over its impact on digital rights and self-censorship.
The Asia Internet Coalition, representing major tech companies, warns the bill could harm Sri Lanka’s digital economy. It may also deter foreign direct investment.
Journalists fear the bill could severely impact their work. This could lead to self-censorship and the closure of news websites.
Despite the Supreme Court’s 2023 verdict, many fundamental flaws remain unaddressed. These include provisions for an opaque regulatory body without independent oversight.
The bill could worsen Sri Lanka’s economic crisis. It may have far-reaching effects on platform accountability and internet regulation in the country.
Sri Lanka Passes Bill Allowing Government to Remove Online Posts
Sri Lanka’s parliament passed the controversial Online Safety bill with a majority vote. Opposition parties, media groups, and civil rights activists raised concerns. The bill aims to tackle online fraud, cyber harassment, and data theft.
Critics fear it could limit free speech and press freedom. The government claims it will protect user privacy and national security.
Government’s Justification for the Bill
Public Security Minister Tiran Alles introduced the bill to fight rising online crimes. In 2022, over 8,000 complaints about online offenses were filed with Sri Lankan police.
These included sexual abuse, financial scams, and cyber harassment. Alles stated the bill wasn’t meant to harass media or political opponents.
Concerns over Freedom of Expression and Press Freedom
Rights groups worry about the bill’s impact on internet freedom. They fear it could suppress anti-government protests. US Ambassador Julie Chung urged transparency to protect people’s voices.
The International Federation of Journalists criticized the proposed commission. They say it’s controlled by the President, opposing true press freedom. This contradicts the need for a self-regulating media system.
| Key Statistics | Details |
|---|---|
| Online Safety Bill Vote | Passed with 108 votes in favor, 62 against in the 225-member parliament |
| Online Crime Complaints (2022) | More than 8,000 complaints filed, including sexual abuse, financial scams, cyber harassment, and data theft |
| Sri Lanka’s Debt Crisis | Declared bankruptcy in 2022 with over $83 billion in debt, more than half owed to foreign creditors |
| IMF Bailout Package | Agreed to a $2.9 billion bailout package for Sri Lanka |
| Upcoming Presidential Election | Scheduled to be held later this year |
Conclusion
Sri Lanka’s Online Safety Bill has sparked debate about freedom of expression. Critics worry it gives authorities too much power to censor content. The government says it’s needed to fight online crimes.
The bill’s restrictions may discourage tech giants from investing in Sri Lanka. This could slow economic growth and technological progress. Many question the government’s ability to judge truth from falsehood.
The bill is a hot topic as Sri Lanka nears its presidential election. Public discontent is already high due to new taxes and rising energy costs. Religious diversity may be at risk if certain voices are suppressed.
Sri Lanka must carefully weigh the bill’s consequences. A balanced approach is needed to protect citizens’ rights and support the digital economy. The country should aim for transparency, accountability, and free expression.
